![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Donate | Image Hosting | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Modo ENG What will be Modo 606 ? :) |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| proud to be a nurb ![]() | You could render the same scene in numerous render engines, all using equivalent settings. But they will all render differently. The fact is some render engines just have higher quality output than others do... Carrara's texture room is not an accurate depiction of how the object will render in the the final. But Modo's real-time preview is pretty damn close. It makes material/lighting setup incredibly fast. This has a big impact in achieveing the deired render quality. Certainly for me, it does. I never quite got along with C5. But Modo and I are pretty tight... |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Crazt is back! ![]() | So i better start saving? ![]() ![]() Maybe not, i came across this. http://forums.luxology.com/discussio...20546&show=301 I think i stick to carrara. at least they are doing fixes. Last edited by behzad : 18th November 2007 at 23:24. |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Misinterpreted signal ![]() | I think, you and modo just well supplement each other. I'm not so lucky. For example, I put two backdrop images, ajust transparency, put one(!) cube(!!) to a scene, go to "model quad view", en voilà - modo eats 50% of my CPU (2.66 Core 2 Duo) on every click. Of course, it does not happen when I use other backdrop images in other scenes. Even whith the same scene while I am in a "model" view, everything is okay.
__________________ (Vista 64-bit, Intel E6700, 2GB, GeForce 8800GTS) |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) | |
| proud to be a nurb ![]() | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Misinterpreted signal ![]() | No, I had not. And nothing changes after I did. In any case thank for advice, shorty. However, as I said before, I have not this problem with similar scenes, so I did not expect you would reproduce this bug. I just demonstrated an example of strange modo 301 behaviour even in simple situations.
__________________ (Vista 64-bit, Intel E6700, 2GB, GeForce 8800GTS) |
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) |
| Misinterpreted signal ![]() | ok They gave me $100 discount on uprade, and I did it ![]() I hate myself. I hate them. I hate Christmas. I hate Father Frost. I hate you, shorty! But, at least, they'd return me $50 for both the trial and seahorse tutor I bought earlier.
__________________ (Vista 64-bit, Intel E6700, 2GB, GeForce 8800GTS) |
| | |
| | #32 (permalink) |
| Hexagoner ![]() | Merry Christmas and I don't charge for wishing you all Merry Christmas, it is free!!! ![]()
__________________ Seek and ye shall find. JESUS Hexagon 2|Carrara 6 Pro|Photoshop CS2| Painter X http://richchurchtoday.blogspot.com/ |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Hexagoner ![]() | Except saying it, hmmmm, got to double check that, maybe Wal-Mart is charging... ![]() ![]()
__________________ Seek and ye shall find. JESUS Hexagon 2|Carrara 6 Pro|Photoshop CS2| Painter X http://richchurchtoday.blogspot.com/ |
| | |