clic to reload the forum home - Cliquez pour recharger le forum
The homepage Blog in englishLe blog de la page d'accueilVisit the english language forum!Allez directement au forum françaisGo to the gallery! - Allez visiter la galerie !The files to download - textures, softwares, etc.Les fichiers à télécharger : textures, logiciels, etc.3D and 2D challenges!Come and talk together in realtime - Venez tous discuter ensemble !About Polyloop.netA propos de Polyloop.net
Go Back   Polyloop - 3D & 2D Forums > English > Modeling - Sculpting

Modeling - Sculpting Dedicated forum to all the modeling questions & comments, from boxmodeling, edge modeling, assembly of shapes, etc. to sculpting.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7th July 2007, 00:44   #1 (permalink)
Box modeling
 
mykyl1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
Testing Amapi 7.5?

I have been testing Amapi using the demo of 7.5 and surprisingly I am finding it pretty simple although there are some niggles. However one thing I am trying to figure out is if there is a way to get amapi to export N-gons instead of tris or tris and quads. I have been testing Moi3d and the export using n_gons outputs really usable models for use within Carrara or Modo so I have been hunting for a way to do this with Amapi. Any ideas if this is possible? Cheers Mike R
__________________
I dont believe everything I think.
mykyl1966 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 15:26   #2 (permalink)
Box modeling
 
mykyl1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
45 views. I am guessing someone must use Amapi from that group yet no repy. I guess its not possible then. Shame really as most test models have rendered with artifacts in Carrara and Modo and Truespace so far.

Or can someone out there who knows Amapi please help me out.

Cheers

Mike R
__________________
I dont believe everything I think.
mykyl1966 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 16:18   #3 (permalink)
Rhymes with Hell.
 
Hugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: France
Posts: 2,987
Send a message via AIM to Hugo Send a message via MSN to Hugo
Did you use the crackfree tesselation ?
__________________
WARNING: The following posts contain explicit content. By viewing them, you are making the following statement:
I am viewing explicit content.

Hugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 18:26   #4 (permalink)
Box modeling
 
mykyl1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
Thanks for that. Although not perfect I used Quick adaptive and crack free and that works much better. The adaptive and crackfree is a waste of space. .

Thanks for that

Cheers
Mike R
__________________
I dont believe everything I think.
mykyl1966 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 18:43   #5 (permalink)
Rhymes with Hell.
 
Hugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: France
Posts: 2,987
Send a message via AIM to Hugo Send a message via MSN to Hugo
I'm not shure to understood all, does it work better and wich one you dislike ?
I'm betatester, i'm always happy to read what the user think about some feature.
cheers
__________________
WARNING: The following posts contain explicit content. By viewing them, you are making the following statement:
I am viewing explicit content.

Hugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 21:48   #6 (permalink)
Box modeling
 
mykyl1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
There are three options for tesselation.
'Standard' which results in a very high polygon model.

'Quick adaptive and crack free' results in a nice clean model pretty much made up entirely of quads.

'Adaptive and crack free' which is pretty much messy. A mixture of quads and tri's and doesn't render cleanly enough most of the time.


I have included a screen shot from Modo showing the resultant mesh of each method of tesselation.

One of the best exporters I have seen is the way Moi3d does it. It has the option of exporting n-gons which in general are of no use but are easy to work with and do render cleanly every time.

Take a look at it and see how well it works.

Cheers

Mike R
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Tesselation.jpg
Views:	52
Size:	62.8 KB
ID:	20778  
__________________
I dont believe everything I think.
mykyl1966 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 7th July 2007, 22:29   #7 (permalink)
Rhymes with Hell.
 
Hugo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: France
Posts: 2,987
Send a message via AIM to Hugo Send a message via MSN to Hugo
N-gons are cool on planar face of course, but most of the time the artifact you can see in your rendering engine come from some equal point or/and bad phong smooth (angle)

Can you create for me a quick model with the artifact you're talking about, please ?
One amapi nurbs file, on polygonal object from the nurbs and if possible the same model in Moi3D so i can check ?
Thanks, have fun
__________________
WARNING: The following posts contain explicit content. By viewing them, you are making the following statement:
I am viewing explicit content.

Hugo is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 8th July 2007, 01:08   #8 (permalink)
Box modeling
 
mykyl1966's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 278
Ok I hope these tell you what I mean. I put together a quick example of nothing in particular. .

The first image is a screen capture from my rendering applications main window.

1. This is an obj export from amapi using adaptive and crack free tesselation. Not much use. Lots of splits etc.

2. This is an obj export from amapi using standard tesselation. Notice the splits ringed in red and also in the small preview render. Once again no use without fixing.

Both of the above have something else in common. They are both not very smooth as the arrow on number two points to the jagged silhouette of the model.

3. This is an obj export from amapi using Quick adaptive and crack free tesselation. Pretty nice and no jagged silhouette. In fact good enough that if really needed you could sub-d the model without problems. (As I have done with some other experiments.)

4. This is an obj exported from Moi3D using N-gons. Fairly clean silhouette, no splits in the geometry and if really needed you can sub-d this model without problems. (As I have done with some other experiments.)

The second image is just a quick render of all four obj files within Modo.

Cheers

Mike
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	FourVersions.jpg
Views:	42
Size:	122.2 KB
ID:	20779  Click image for larger version

Name:	AllRendered.jpg
Views:	39
Size:	207.7 KB
ID:	20780  
__________________
I dont believe everything I think.
mykyl1966 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On





All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:09.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Polyloop - 3D & 2D Community Forum - © Thomas Roussel