Windows and ram Question - Polyloop

Nate Owens · 7th October 2007, 21:12

It seems (from what I hear) that I am reaching the ceiling for ram using Windows XP pro. I am at 2 gigabytes of Ram now pushing that with some of the projects.

So, I hear that I have to get a 32 bit Windows system and that would be Vista in order to go with more than the 2 gigabytes of ram?

True?

I have heard differing opinions on the stability of Vista, and the use of different software programs with Vista.

Any opinions on how Hexagon, Zbrush, Photoshop (7), Dreamweaver 8, Rhino 4, etc. like Vista?

Thanks.

Pete Exxtreme · 7th October 2007, 21:33

XP pro can manage up to 4Gb RAM, but one 32 bits process (carrara.exe is one process) can "only" allocate itself up to 2Gb of RAM. If you want to use more RAM, you need to have both a 64 bits operating system (XP 64bits for example) with 64 bits compiled programs (it does not exist for Carrara). Then the RAM limit is something like 4Tb of RAM, but with more powerfull version of windows than the XP Pro which is "limited" to 128Gb i think...

Nate Owens · 7th October 2007, 21:52

Ok

Thanks for clarifying this

Sooooooooo....

If I Have Windows XP 64 bit OS.... Will Carrara still run inside that (even though it can't access more than 2 gigs)... I mean could I run both 32 bit and 64 bit softrware under Windows XP 64?

Thanks

gksl4 · 7th October 2007, 22:45

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate Owens

Ok

Thanks for clarifying this

Sooooooooo....

If I Have Windows XP 64 bit OS.... Will Carrara still run inside that (even though it can't access more than 2 gigs)... I mean could I run both 32 bit and 64 bit softrware under Windows XP 64?

Thanks

Yes Nate, but most 32 bit programs have limit 1.5 to 2 gb. So you need 64 bit version of software if exists.

Pete Exxtreme · 8th October 2007, 06:35

this gives extra explanations

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows...al_x64_Edition

bwtr · 8th October 2007, 07:36

Forget about Vista still, forget about XP64, still.

Stick with the standard Xp(32) and 4GB ram untill they have sorted out ALL the problems, and have apps able to to work with them.

Your best bet, BY FAR, is to get a top notch card that can work fast with OpenGL..

gksl4 · 8th October 2007, 14:44

IMHO Win XP 64 bit are very stable, plenty of memory room, there is much more hardware support since when first indrodused and the only drawback is the luck of Internet Firewall from most vendors.

Nate Owens · 8th October 2007, 15:06

I'm going to have to do some research.

My graphics card is fine - works well with Zbrush, Hexagon, all the heavy hitters I have used.

I hit some memory issues when using Zbrush... and in general more ram (I'm at 2 gigs now) would seem to be the answer for boosting up my system - that and going to a multiple processor system.

Some say if you want more ram than 2 gigs you must go to 64 bit, others say that Windows XP pro (which I have) can do 4gb.

When I get to my other computer (this is from the laptop) I will go to the wiki and take a look. Chances are I will stay with what I have for a while, but dancing around trying to milk it is a bit frustrating.

Thank you guys for all the good info and pointers.. PolyLoop and the gang that hangs out here ROCKS!

behzad · 12th October 2007, 00:06

Nate use this program, it does wonders for me. you can always right click and do a clearing on your waste memory

http://www.bestvistadownloads.com/so...-zfjrzruz.html

Wася · 20th October 2007, 11:06

Here is info
http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system...AE/PAEmem.mspx
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Aa366778.aspx
about memory limits in 32&64-bit and some memory tricks in 32-bit Windows systems.
And here
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...loringx64.mspx
Charlie says exaclty, that 32-bit app need to be compiled with /3GB switch in order to be able to use additional gig of address space.

However, with regular 32 bit app you can have not big, but some advantage on a 64-bit system with more than 4 GB RAM by keeping many apps open simultaneously without swap them out. Even operating system itself + anti-viral programs et al may use 500MB, eating the memory available to your application.

What is bad about XP 64 Pro is its restriction of CPU using - it can not use more than 2 CPU, and I don't know how it will behave on 4-core CPU. In the end it's not too new version of OS.

jbshorty · 20th October 2007, 16:18

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nate Owens

...Any opinions on how Hexagon, Zbrush, Photoshop (7), Dreamweaver 8, Rhino 4, etc. like Vista?

McNeel says that Rhino 4 nowruns on Vista. Although there are reportedly some minor interface glitches...

jb

Nate Owens · 20th October 2007, 16:42

Thanks for the tips.
I'm working on a series of projects that will hopefully help finance my system upgrades, so all the data will be useful. It seems that the common factor I am seeing when I inquire of those using some heavy duty software making complex graphics is the use of mulit-core processors (duo and quad -core). My system is just a single core, so upgrading that along with better/faster bus will be a main focus.

I think I will stay with the 32 bit OS for now and see how the technology/stability issues shake out.

7th October 2007, 21:12	#1 (permalink)
Nate Owens Doodlin' Dude Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: South Carolina, USA Posts: 975 My Photos: (23) Images: 11	Windows and ram Question It seems (from what I hear) that I am reaching the ceiling for ram using Windows XP pro. I am at 2 gigabytes of Ram now pushing that with some of the projects. So, I hear that I have to get a 32 bit Windows system and that would be Vista in order to go with more than the 2 gigabytes of ram? True? I have heard differing opinions on the stability of Vista, and the use of different software programs with Vista. Any opinions on how Hexagon, Zbrush, Photoshop (7), Dreamweaver 8, Rhino 4, etc. like Vista? Thanks. __________________ Portfolio / Shirts, MousePads, Stuff / The Gallery / Videos

7th October 2007, 21:33	#2 (permalink)
Pete Exxtreme Lick it up Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Thonon/France Posts: 4,617 My Photos: (2) Images: 21	XP pro can manage up to 4Gb RAM, but one 32 bits process (carrara.exe is one process) can "only" allocate itself up to 2Gb of RAM. If you want to use more RAM, you need to have both a 64 bits operating system (XP 64bits for example) with 64 bits compiled programs (it does not exist for Carrara). Then the RAM limit is something like 4Tb of RAM, but with more powerfull version of windows than the XP Pro which is "limited" to 128Gb i think... __________________ Toute faute de frappe ou erreur de syntaxe sont dues a un clavier rebelle à toute forme d'autorité. LightWave 9 \| Hexagon 2 My gallery

7th October 2007, 21:52	#3 (permalink)
Nate Owens Doodlin' Dude Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: South Carolina, USA Posts: 975 My Photos: (23) Images: 11	Ok Thanks for clarifying this Sooooooooo.... If I Have Windows XP 64 bit OS.... Will Carrara still run inside that (even though it can't access more than 2 gigs)... I mean could I run both 32 bit and 64 bit softrware under Windows XP 64? Thanks __________________ Portfolio / Shirts, MousePads, Stuff / The Gallery / Videos Last edited by Nate Owens : 7th October 2007 at 22:39.

8th October 2007, 06:35	#5 (permalink)
Pete Exxtreme Lick it up Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Thonon/France Posts: 4,617 My Photos: (2) Images: 21	this gives extra explanations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows...al_x64_Edition __________________ Toute faute de frappe ou erreur de syntaxe sont dues a un clavier rebelle à toute forme d'autorité. LightWave 9 \| Hexagon 2 My gallery

8th October 2007, 15:06	#8 (permalink)
Nate Owens Doodlin' Dude Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: South Carolina, USA Posts: 975 My Photos: (23) Images: 11	I'm going to have to do some research. My graphics card is fine - works well with Zbrush, Hexagon, all the heavy hitters I have used. I hit some memory issues when using Zbrush... and in general more ram (I'm at 2 gigs now) would seem to be the answer for boosting up my system - that and going to a multiple processor system. Some say if you want more ram than 2 gigs you must go to 64 bit, others say that Windows XP pro (which I have) can do 4gb. When I get to my other computer (this is from the laptop) I will go to the wiki and take a look. Chances are I will stay with what I have for a while, but dancing around trying to milk it is a bit frustrating. Thank you guys for all the good info and pointers.. PolyLoop and the gang that hangs out here ROCKS! __________________ Portfolio / Shirts, MousePads, Stuff / The Gallery / Videos

8th October 2007, 07:36	#6 (permalink)
bwtr Brian Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: South Australia Posts: 2,042 My Photos: (6) Images: 49	Forget about Vista still, forget about XP64, still. Stick with the standard Xp(32) and 4GB ram untill they have sorted out ALL the problems, and have apps able to to work with them. Your best bet, BY FAR, is to get a top notch card that can work fast with OpenGL..

8th October 2007, 14:44	#7 (permalink)
gksl4 Vertex Join Date: May 2006 Posts: 25 My Photos: (0)	IMHO Win XP 64 bit are very stable, plenty of memory room, there is much more hardware support since when first indrodused and the only drawback is the luck of Internet Firewall from most vendors.

12th October 2007, 00:06	#9 (permalink)
behzad Crazt is back! Join Date: May 2005 Location: Toronto Posts: 1,343 My Photos: (0) Images: 1	Nate use this program, it does wonders for me. you can always right click and do a clearing on your waste memory http://www.bestvistadownloads.com/so...-zfjrzruz.html

20th October 2007, 11:06	#10 (permalink)
Wася Misinterpreted signal Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Moscow, Russia Posts: 313 My Photos: (3)	Here is info http://www.microsoft.com/whdc/system...AE/PAEmem.mspx http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/Aa366778.aspx about memory limits in 32&64-bit and some memory tricks in 32-bit Windows systems. And here http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/u...loringx64.mspx Charlie says exaclty, that 32-bit app need to be compiled with /3GB switch in order to be able to use additional gig of address space. However, with regular 32 bit app you can have not big, but some advantage on a 64-bit system with more than 4 GB RAM by keeping many apps open simultaneously without swap them out. Even operating system itself + anti-viral programs et al may use 500MB, eating the memory available to your application. What is bad about XP 64 Pro is its restriction of CPU using - it can not use more than 2 CPU, and I don't know how it will behave on 4-core CPU. In the end it's not too new version of OS. __________________ (Vista 64-bit, Intel E6700, 2GB, GeForce 8800GTS)

20th October 2007, 16:42	#12 (permalink)
Nate Owens Doodlin' Dude Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: South Carolina, USA Posts: 975 My Photos: (23) Images: 11	Thanks for the tips. I'm working on a series of projects that will hopefully help finance my system upgrades, so all the data will be useful. It seems that the common factor I am seeing when I inquire of those using some heavy duty software making complex graphics is the use of mulit-core processors (duo and quad -core). My system is just a single core, so upgrading that along with better/faster bus will be a main focus. I think I will stay with the 32 bit OS for now and see how the technology/stability issues shake out. __________________ Portfolio / Shirts, MousePads, Stuff / The Gallery / Videos

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode