Polyloop - 3D & 2D Forums - View Single Post

Naes3d · 3rd April 2006, 02:33

I agree with you AlainK, like I said I was probably being unfair. But I still believe in the case of symmetry, it's been withheld or at least put off. It would seem to be one of the easier requests to pull off since almost everything is already in place (but then I am not a programmer). I am about 98.99% satisfied with Carrara the rest being the missing live symmetry feature.

Like I said, I am no programmer-and like you said, Carrara is a very capable package - but I don't think that the symmetry modelling would require changing the engine.

3rd April 2006, 02:33	#13 (permalink)
Naes3d Box modeling Join Date: Oct 2005 Posts: 231	I agree with you AlainK, like I said I was probably being unfair. But I still believe in the case of symmetry, it's been withheld or at least put off. It would seem to be one of the easier requests to pull off since almost everything is already in place (but then I am not a programmer). I am about 98.99% satisfied with Carrara the rest being the missing live symmetry feature. Like I said, I am no programmer-and like you said, Carrara is a very capable package - but I don't think that the symmetry modelling would require changing the engine.