![]() | ![]() | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| |||||||
| Notices |
| 3D Work In Progress & Finished works Post your 3D creation in progress and Finished works here. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| subhuman infection ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: in a dirty sock
Posts: 1,412
| NURBS cameo button
Hi. This is a NURBS solid polysurface model. Modeled and test rendered in Rhino 4.0 beta. Every detail is geometry, no displacement or bump mapping used in render. I was inspired by all the recent use of displacement sculpting, and wanted to see how far i could go using 100% NURBS... |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| subhuman infection ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: in a dirty sock
Posts: 1,412
|
thanks davidoff. here is a wireframe. The extracted render mesh is about 600,000 polygons (the 12 small flowers added 400,000 to the model). It's really more than necessary for a good render, but i wanted to show very smooth details. I probably could have gotten excellent results with half of that polygon count... |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| NURBS Booleans are your friend ![]() Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 117
|
Nice display of Rhino nurbs. Good work, are you going to displacement sculpt the profile at some point? I think that it is an interesting decision that the artist has to make now; that is how far to push the mesh detail, vs when to start the displacement brushing. Once again, nicely done. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| subhuman infection ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: in a dirty sock
Posts: 1,412
|
thanks for the compliments guys. It's an interestng question when to consider a displacement sculpt vs. nurbs surfacing for high detail models. I'd done an alpha stamping in the silo 2 beta using the same cameo design. check the link below to see that screenshot. the silo model was an open mesh (no back face) and was about 328,000 polys. If i were to attempt displacement sculpting the same button model, i would probably be in the 6-7 million poly range because those little flowers would require a very dense mesh for a clean sharp stamping. The big advantage for me to use Nurbs is that the mesh is dense only where necessary. And i like my details to be clean and sharp. My future workflow will include sculpting elements in Silo, importing to Rhino and converting them into Nurbs objects. But i don't i will think export a meshed rhino model to sculpt in Silo because a mesh extracted from a polysurface doesn't make a nice even topology... Teyon, next year if you see a cactus dressed up like Bob McNeel, don't try to hug him. It's a trick!http://www.silo3d.com/forum/showthre...alpha+stamping |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Go Team Venture! ![]() Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 191
|
You have to own Rhino 3 to use the Rhino 4 beta. Rhino has always had a Heightfield from Bitmap generator, which can be used in conjunction with other features to simulate displacement. However, it does not have a true displacement painting option when last I checked.
|
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| subhuman infection ![]() Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: in a dirty sock
Posts: 1,412
|
Thanks Marcello. Currently there is no tool for displacing an existing surface. I used the "heightfield image" tool to produce a displaced surface on the contruction plane (maybe this is called "grey scale" in the french version?). Then i trim away the unwanted areas and work the displaced surface into the model... There is a plug-in available for displacing a mesh surface within Rhino 3 (it doesn't work on nurbs surfaces), which can be found at www.reconstructivism.net . This is the personal website of David Rutten, before he started to work for McNeel. It's worth checking out his site, he has lots of really interesting plug-ins. True, Rhino 3 had the heightfield surface generator. But R4 also has tools to morph the new surface onto a target surface, making a model such as this button much easier to develop... |
| | |