bwtr,
I posted that it is great that you did compare Carrara 5 to Carrara 6. I do not have Carrara 6 so I could only make suggestions. I thought maybe Carrara 6 always did renders and test renders from Camera 1 reguardless of how many cameras were set up. I could see a program with this type of glitch. The main problem I had is that you posted there was no reason to use the isometric camera and then implied PhotoShop would be a nice solution. I thought most photographers were hip to isometric drafting views. I had to do isometric drafting views in Jr. High.
Quote:
Originally Posted by bwtr  mediamajic
Not that it matters but I was trying to compare the C5/C6 Windows version variation problems--which I can not percieve.
I think it's crazy to be going down this isometric approach, in Carrara ,to image making.
Am I suggesting taking more logical, easier, ways to get the end results wanted?
I just try to get minds to expand, think in alternative directions. If I had not had both C5 and C6 on the desk top I would not have got involved--if no-one "thought" maybe I have wasted time. Not that that is important! |
You are saying you can get isometric views with the conical camera and PhotoShop and it is an easier way to get the end result? I think we are all a bit confused by your statement. I set up the scene and rendered those images in less than 10 minutes. Overall the conical and isometric cameras are not hard to use. I think Carrara 6 must have a bug. Could you please download my conical images and make them look like the isometric images with PhotoShop CS? I would be interested in seeing this done. I am not sure how your posts would get our minds to expand. I think were all hip to PhotoShop but I see no need for it to get isometric images from Carrara.