Quote:
Originally Posted by Wася  My point is exactly relevant to what you were refering. I say "it's limited", and it's not okay. You say "it's limited", but it's okay for you. Just because they started after others (and who has not?)
In my life I heard too much about how easy somebody can build new wings for the existing house. Everybody can do it. Only their competitors do decorations. Modular architecture, object-oriented architecture, component-based architecture, service-based architecture, blah-blah-blah. But I'd never seen a nuclear plant built from a living house, or a submarine built from a car. It's just a marketing, nothing more. But I see, they found a fertile field.
modo is cool, but it's not impossible to be a leader in one (even important) aspect. They already have a problem with render scalability (60% speed-up after doubling CPU quantity is not "linear" and not even "near linear"), they will encounter more and more difficulties as they will implement more and more features. As a result you will have just another tool good in some things and not so good (maybe even bad) in others. |
No its not. You completely did not understand my point. But its ok. You are incorrect on your render scalability. Not sure where you are getting your performance specs, but mine show linear scalability.